News
News

Drew Peterson facing sentencing Thursday if new trial bid fails

Drew Peterson could be sentenced to up to 60 years in prison Thursday if a judge rejects defense team arguments that his former lead attorney's inept trial performance violated his constitutional rights to a fair trial.

Judge Edward Burmila is expected to rule Thursday whether the former Bolingbrook police sergeant will get a new trial, a rarely granted motion.

If not, Burmila will begin a sentencing hearing at which prosecutors have said they plan to argue Peterson also killed his fourth wife, Stacy, who went missing in 2007, in asking for the maximum sentence.

Peterson, 59, was convicted by a jury last fall of first-degree murder in the 2004 bathtub drowning of his third wife, Kathleen Savio.

Among the oddities Wednesday, during the unusual hearing on post-trial motions that has stretched across two days, was former Peterson lead attorney Joel Brodsky chatting in a courthouse hallway with Stacy's sister Cassandra Cales.

Both declined to detail their conversation. “We were just discussing how to make sure that her sister Stacy isn't forgotten after Drew goes away,” Brodsky said.

Much of Wednesday's hearing focused on Brodsky's trial decision to call Wheaton divorce attorney Harry Smith, who represented Savio in her bitter divorce fight with Peterson and also fielded a call from Stacy about her divorce options shortly before she vanished.

Smith testified at trial that Stacy had asked him if the fact that Peterson killed his third wife could be used as leverage in a divorce.

Several jurors said after trial that the testimony convinced them of Peterson's guilt. There was no physical evidence tying Peterson to Savio's death, which was initially treated as an accident.

Retired Cook County Judge Daniel Locallo, called as a witness by Peterson's attorneys, blasted Brodsky for calling Smith, saying the testimony for the first time at trial connected Peterson to Savio's death.

The retired judge said that, in his opinion, Brodsky's decisions constituted ineffective assistance of counsel, which can be grounds for a new trial.

“It was an awful decision,” defense attorney Steve Greenberg later argued in court. “It ruined the case -- we brought out the worst possible evidence, and the best evidence for the state.”

The defense team also attempted to call to the stand Will County State's Attorney James Glasgow to explain his comment in a courthouse hallway during the trial that Smith's testimony was “a gift from God.”

Greenberg wanted to use the statement to contradict prosecutors' argument that Smith's testimony was part of well-thought-out defense strategy.

Burmila first called Glasgow to be sworn in, but stopped the process after prosecutors said Peterson had failed to meet the legal standards necessary to call him.

Assistant State's Attorney Marie Czech argued that Brodsky's decision to call Smith was a calculated risk to discredit Stacy by attempting to show she was out for money, and not grounds for a new trial.

“There was a strategic decision,” she argued. “It was well-conceived.”

Greenberg argued that the upside was so small and the risks so monumental that there was no way Brodsky's decision could have been part of a reasonable trial strategy.

“Whatever kernel of impeachment Mr. Brodsky thought he was going to get out of it paled in comparison to the mountain of damage that it brought out,” Greenberg said. “It was awful strategy, and that strategy alone means Mr. Peterson should get a new trial from this court.”

Brodsky, who could be heard sighing loudly as he listened to Wednesday's arguments in an overflow room, continued to assert that he was not alone in the decision to call Smith, saying Greenberg supported the decision.

“A number of lies and misrepresentations were made about me today, but you know, I've got tough skin,” Brodsky said. “I can handle that.”

Stacy's older sister Cales said she was “very excited” that Peterson could be sentenced Thursday.

“Even if he gets the minimum of 20 years, technically that's life for him because he's an old man,” she said.

Cales said that she still holds out hope that someone will come forward with information about her sister's disappearance. Prosecutors have said they are reviewing the case again with an eye to possibly bringing charges.

“Maybe that person out there will have a conscience and come forward because Drew will be away at prison and will be unable to hurt them,” Cales said.

mwalberg@tribune.com
sschmadeke@tribune.com

Copyright © 2015, RedEye
Related Content
  • Defense team and witness

    Defense team and witness

    (Left to right) Retired judge and witness Daniel Locallo joins defense attorneys Steve Greenberg, Joe Lopez and Lisa Lopez, as the hearing on a motion for a new Drew Peterson trial broke for lunch at the Will County Courthouse in Joliet, Ill.

  • Joel Brodsky leaves courthouse

    Joel Brodsky leaves courthouse

    Joel Brodsky speaks to the media gathered outside the Will County Courthouse in Joliet, Ill., after attorneys argued before a judge whether Drew Peterson should get a new trial after his murder conviction last fall in the death of his third wife, Kathleen Savio.

  • Peterson attorneys

    Peterson attorneys

    Defense attorneys Joe Lopez, left, and Steve Greenberg talk to reporters as the hearing on a motion for a new Drew Peterson trial breaks for lunch outside the Will County Courthouse in Joliet today.

  • Who's who in the Drew Peterson case

    Who's who in the Drew Peterson case

    Who's who in the Drew Peterson case NameRelevance to case Abood, AndrewDrew Peterson attorney Aikin, CandaceStacy Peterson's aunt Alessio-Policandriotes, CarlaWill Co, judge Allen, James JeffreyWill Co. judge; signed Savio protection order Akin, Robert Jr.Locksmith who opened the Savio's door Anderson,...

  • Drew Peterson timeline and archives

    Drew Peterson timeline and archives

    Drew Peterson timeline and archives Use the left and right arrow keys or previous and next buttons to navigate the timeline. Related Chicago Tribune articles, if available, can be accessed through the corresponding timeline entry. You can sort entries by checking and unchecking categories.

  • Points of interest in Drew Peterson case

    Points of interest in Drew Peterson case

  • PDFs: Drew Peterson case file

    PDFs: Drew Peterson case file

    Drew Peterson document archive

  • 'A Walk in the Woods' is soft and mushy

    'A Walk in the Woods' is soft and mushy

    Because “A Walk in the Woods” quickly wanders from a funny look at life at a crossroads to an obvious series of embarrassing nonsense and basic observations about nature and people, let’s just rattle off some things bumbling around my head during the movie:

Comments
Loading
74°