Sandusky wasn't convincing -- more like convicted

I don’t know why Jerry Sandusky or his attorney thought it was a good idea to launch a media offensive and submit to interviews on NBC and CNN on Monday night.

Perhaps what passes for a brain trust on Team Sandusky thought it was better than being spotted at Dick’s Sporting Goods around Penn State wearing Penn State apparel while inexplicably out on bail awaiting trial on charges of sexually abusing eight boys over a 15-year period on Penn State grounds.

If that’s an example of the kind of legal counsel Sandusky will get, then people who want to see the former Penn State defensive coordinator locked up might get their wish.

Silence would’ve been the better option because in attempting to maintain innocence, Sandusky and his lawyer seemed to underscore his guilt.

“I could say I’ve done some of those things,’’ Sandusky told Bob Costas in a telephone interview on NBC’s “Rock Center with Brian Williams.’’  “I have horsed around with kids I have showered (with) after workouts. I have hugged them, and I have touched their legs without intent of sexual contact.’’

So now you have the accused admitting he showered with boys again and again and again, horsed around with them in the shower again and again and again, and touched them again and again and again. That’s criminal to some degree already. That’s criminal again and again and again.

So, why would any juror who isn’t being paid off or who isn’t a mouthbreathing Paterno-head believe that’s where it stopped?

Joe Amendola, Sandusky’s attorney, made it sound as if it’s OK for a grown man to shower with boys. Amendola claimed that’s just the “jock’’ mentality. In my world, that's a sick mentality.

Amendola said Team Sandusky has “information’’ that the boy at the center of the investigation will come forward and say he wasn’t raped in the shower by Sandusky as then-graduate assistant Mike McQueary claimed he witnessed before telling head coach Joe Paterno.

Amendola didn’t produce the alleged victim. Amendola didn’t claim that the alleged victim has recanted anything to authorities. Amendola just said he has “information.’’

It sounds as if the “information’’ is a message to prosecutors, but especially to the alleged victims. It’s a message that is standard strategy in sexual abuse cases: The defense is daring the victims to make themselves known and testify amid the mental and emotional scars that might never go away and certainly will be ripped open to bleed over again if they take the stand.

I can’t imagine how miserable, painful and gut-wrenching that experience must be for victims. Terror, loathing, guilt, vulnerability, disbelief, depression --- to be violated is despicable. To relive it seems punitive.

That’s why defense attorneys force victims to do it.

And yet, if the alleged key victim and several other alleged victims will claim the grand jury case is wrong, then why wouldn’t they be saying that now to help a man as generous and fun-loving and big-hearted as Sandusky?

Not that Sandusky came off as any of that Monday night. He hardly came off as a man who believes he has been wronged.

Sandusky didn’t sound strong. He didn’t sound defiant. No anger, no indignation. He tried to say he was innocent, but did it with a voice begging for mercy.

If I was charged with crimes and knew I was innocent, then I’d be screaming it from the highest building on campus and be screaming it from the start.

Sandusky was lame and evasive, from “Ask (fill in a witness’ name)’’ to “I can’t exactly recall.’’ He made some distinct pauses. He repeated some questions. That’s a massive tell. Repeating the question means someone is looking for an answer. At one point, the question Sandusky repeated regarded whether he was attracted to boys.

All with a dull, flat, almost resigned-to-his-fate tone of voice.

The most telling part of the interview came when Costas asked Sandusky if Paterno ever talked to him about any part of the stories or alleged events.

Sandusky said no. Sandusky said no each time Costas tweaked the scenario, from asking whether Paterno talked to him about the story or the charges or the need for behavioral help. Sandusky said no and left it at that.

The answer further condemned Paterno and further indicted Sandusky.

It’s ludicrous to imagine that Paterno, who cast himself as a moral paragon, wouldn’t ask someone that close to him for so many years whether he raped a boy.

Why wouldn’t Paterno follow up with Sandusky as a concerned friend? A friend helps.

Why wouldn't Paterno follow up as the outraged moral center of Penn State? A moral center leads.

Paterno did neither. Paterno was neither. Sandusky’s answer revealed Paterno as a sanctimonious hypocrite. Sandusky’s answer also revealed himself as guilty.

I can only conclude that Paterno would find no need to follow up if he knew that Sandusky had committed such acts for many years.

Copyright © 2015, RedEye
Related Content
  • McQueary: 'I did stop it'

    McQueary: 'I did stop it'

    Penn State assistant football coach also says in email that he did discuss the shower incident with police.

  • Bold predictions for Lolla 2015

    Bold predictions for Lolla 2015

    The Lolla schedule is sort of like the NCAA tournament: there are millions of possible combinations, and it’s anyone’s guess what the winning picks will be. With that in mind, we make some bold predictions about how this year’s fest (returning to Grant Park Fri.-Sun.) will turn out. Breakout artist...

  • 2010 killing of Chicago cop detailed at trial; man claims self-defense

    2010 killing of Chicago cop detailed at trial; man claims self-defense

    The man on trial in the killing of Chicago police Officer Thor Soderberg hated police and surprised the officer as he changed out of his uniform at shift end and placed his duty belt down, a Cook County prosecutor alleged Monday.

  • Aldermen to hold hearing on untested rape kits

    Aldermen to hold hearing on untested rape kits

    Chicago aldermen on Monday called on police officials to provide information on how quickly rape kits are being tested by the state crime lab, part of a largely symbolic effort to determine whether a large backlog is hampering work to apprehend rapists.

  • Alderman's 'Chi-raq' criticism falls flat

    Alderman's 'Chi-raq' criticism falls flat

    A South Side alderman's effort to tweak filmmaker Spike Lee for using "Chi-raq" as the title for a movie about Chicago violence fell flat Monday with his colleagues.

  • ComEd to hold energy fairs to help low-income customers

    ComEd to hold energy fairs to help low-income customers

    Commonwealth Edison will hold energy fairs at satellite locations across the region Monday in order to get money to thousands of people struggling to pay their electricity bills in northern Illinois.

  • PAWS Chicago "Muttshots!"

    PAWS Chicago "Muttshots!"

    These adorable pups are on the loose looking for a place to call home. They have a warrant out for their arrest. Their crime? Being irresistibly cute and cuddly. If you're interested in adopting any of these dogs, please visit for more information.

  • Wabash Lights exceeds Kickstarter goal, hopes to begin test this fall

    Wabash Lights exceeds Kickstarter goal, hopes to begin test this fall

    The designers of an ambitious plan to install colorful LED lights on the underside of the Wabash Avenue "L" tracks raised almost $60,000 in a Kickstarter campaign that will allow them to move forward with a test of the project.